**Principle of Management** is a broad and general guideline for decision-making and behaviour in organisational settings. For example, one manager may consider seniority while promoting an employee, whereas another may follow the principle of merit. These principles serve as foundational rules that guide managerial actions and decisions across various situations.
**Distinction from Related Concepts:**
Management principles are **not as rigid as principles of pure science** because they deal with human behaviour, which is dynamic and ever-changing. For example, the principle of span of control was once limited due to communication constraints. With the advent of Information and Communications Technology (ICT), managers can now oversee large organisations across the globe. Infosys headquarters in Bangalore uses Asia's largest flat screen in their conference room to interact with employees and customers worldwide, demonstrating how technology has expanded managerial capabilities.
Nature refers to the qualities and characteristics of principles. The following are the key characteristics:
Principles of management apply to **all types of organisations** — business and non-business, small and large, public and private sector, manufacturing and services sectors. However, the **extent of their applicability varies** with the nature of organisation, business activity, and scale of operations.
**Example**: Division of work is applicable to both a government office (with diary/despatch clerk, data entry operator, peon, officer) and a limited company (with separate departments like Production, Finance, Marketing, and R&D). However, the extent of division may vary — a small firm may combine multiple roles, while a large corporation has highly specialised positions.
Principles provide **guidelines but not straitjacket solutions** to managerial problems. Real business situations are complex, dynamic, and result from multiple factors. However, even small guidelines help solve given problems.
**Example**: In a conflict between two departments, a manager may emphasise the primacy of overall organisational goals, using this as a guiding principle to resolve the issue.
Principles develop through:
**Example**: The principle that discipline is indispensable for accomplishing any purpose comes from common managerial experience. Similarly, experiments conducted to remedy worker fatigue (e.g., improving physical conditions to reduce stress) form the basis for principles regarding working conditions.
Principles are **not rigid prescriptions** but flexible guidelines that can be **modified by managers** when the situation demands. They provide managers discretion to adapt principles to specific circumstances.
**Example**: The degree of centralisation (concentration of authority) or decentralisation (dispersal of authority) depends on each enterprise's situations and circumstances. A small startup may require more centralisation, while a large multinational corporation may practice more decentralisation.
Management principles aim at **influencing human behaviour**. While they also pertain to things and phenomena, the emphasis is on human factors. Principles help understand relationships between human and material resources in accomplishing organisational purposes.
**Example**: When planning a factory layout, the principle of orderliness requires that workflows match the flow of materials and movement of men.
Principles establish **cause-and-effect relationships** so they can be used in similar situations repeatedly. They indicate what result would likely follow if a particular principle is applied in a specific situation.
**Limitation**: Since principles mainly apply to human behaviour and real-life situations are never identical, establishing perfectly accurate cause-and-effect relationships is difficult. However, principles assist managers in establishing these relationships to some extent and remain useful.
**Example**: In emergencies, someone takes charge and others follow (autocratic approach). But in situations requiring cross-functional expertise (e.g., setting up a new factory), a more participative approach to decision-making would be advisable.
Application of principles is **contingent or dependent upon prevailing situations** at a particular point in time. Principles must be changed as per requirements.
**Example**: Employees deserve fair and just remuneration, but what is "just and fair" is determined by multiple factors — employee contribution, employer's paying capacity, and prevailing wage rates for the occupation. During economic boom, remuneration may increase; during recession, it may be adjusted.
The significance of management principles derives from their **utility in managerial practice**. They provide useful insights into managerial behaviour and influence managerial practices. The following points highlight their importance:
Principles provide managers with **useful insights into real-world situations**. Adherence to these principles adds to their:
**Example**: By following the principle of delegation, a manager can leave routine decision-making to subordinates and deal with exceptional situations requiring her/his expertise. This increases managerial efficiency.
Resources (both human and material) available with organisations are **limited and must be optimally used** to give maximum benefit with minimum cost. Principles enable this by:
**Example**: When deciding annual budgets for different departments, rather than personal preferences, managers use principles like equity and fairness to allocate resources based on departmental needs and organisational priorities.
Principles of management limit **personal prejudices and biases** in decision-making by providing:
Principles contribute to developing management both as **science and art**:
This makes management a **learnable and teachable discipline**, so ascent to managerial positions is based on **requisite qualifications** rather than birth or nepotism.
While functions of management (Planning, Organising, Staffing, Directing, Controlling) are the **actions to be taken**, principles **help managers take decisions** while performing these functions.
**Example**: The case of **Dr. Kiran Mazumdar Shaw** (founder of Biocon) demonstrates how application of management principles transformed a biotechnology company started in a garage with ₹10,000 capital into India's largest integrated biopharmaceutical company. She applied principles of innovation, vision, specialisation, and strategic planning to develop affordable biologics for diabetes, cancer, and autoimmune conditions.
Understanding principles requires knowledge of management's historical evolution through different schools of thought:
The Egyptian pyramids (built in 2900 B.C. by Pharaoh Cheops) required 100,000 men working for 20+ years without sound management principles being evident, demonstrating that organised work has existed since ancient times.
Characterised by:
This era of industrial revolution and factory system made large-scale production possible through division of labour and specialisation principles.
Recognised that employees don't respond only to rules, authority, and economic incentives but are also guided by social needs, drives, and attitudes (Hawthorne Studies).
Used knowledge of psychology, sociology, and anthropology. Philosophers like Chris Argyris, Douglas McGregor, Abraham Maslow, and Fredrick Herzberg believed individuals need to use all capacities and creative skills at work.
Emphasises research on operations and quantitative techniques to aid managerial decision-making.
Views organisations as complex systems, underlining contingency approach and modern techniques for solving organisational and human problems.
---
**F.W. Taylor** (Frederick Winslow Taylor), an American mechanical engineer, developed the concept of **Scientific Management** in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. He believed that management could be approached **scientifically** rather than relying on rule of thumb or traditional methods.
Taylor outlined **five main principles** governing scientific management:
#### 1. Science, Not Rule of Thumb
**Principle**: Replace traditional or rule-of-thumb methods with scientific investigation and experimentation.
**Explanation**: Instead of relying on experience, guesswork, or informal practices, managers should conduct systematic studies and research to determine the most efficient ways of performing work. Every task should be standardised based on scientific observation rather than subjective judgment.
**Example**: Instead of allowing workers to decide how to perform a task based on experience ("We've always done it this way"), a manager conducts time and motion studies to identify the one best way and trains all workers accordingly. This ensures consistency and efficiency across all operations.
#### 2. Harmony, Not Discord
**Principle**: Develop harmony and cooperation between management and workers; avoid conflict and create unity of purpose.
**Explanation**: Taylor believed that conflict between management and workers leads to inefficiency. If both parties understand that increased productivity benefits everyone (through better wages for workers and higher profits for management), they will work together harmoniously. This requires open communication, mutual understanding, and shared goals.
**Example**: In a manufacturing unit, if management and workers jointly identify ways to increase productivity and agree that resultant benefits will be shared (higher wages, better working conditions), both parties work towards common goals rather than opposing each other. This creates "harmony" rather than the historical "discord" or conflict between labour and management.
#### 3. Cooperation, Not Individualism
**Principle**: Encourage cooperation and teamwork; discourage individualistic or selfish behaviour that harms organisational goals.
**Explanation**: Individual workers pursuing their own interests without considering organisational goals lead to inefficiency. Scientific management requires that individual interests be subordinated to collective organisational interests through cooperation and teamwork. Workers should work as a coordinated team rather than isolated individuals.
**Example**: In an assembly line, individual workers cannot maximise their personal output at the expense of the overall production sequence. Each worker must cooperate and synchronise with others to ensure smooth workflow. A worker cannot work at their own pace but must work at the pace determined by the scientific method to maintain overall efficiency.
#### 4. Development of Each Person to Greatest Efficiency
**Principle**: Scientifically select, train, and develop each worker to their maximum potential and capability.
**Explanation**: Not all workers are suited for all jobs. Taylor advocated that managers should scientifically identify the most capable workers for each job, provide them with proper training, and develop them to reach their fullest efficiency. This maximises individual contribution to organisational goals.
**Example**: A company conducting recruitment for different positions uses scientifically designed tests and assessments to identify the most suitable candidates. Once hired, workers receive systematic on-the-job training and coaching to develop their skills to the fullest. A worker who shows aptitude for supervisory roles is provided leadership training to develop them into effective supervisors.
#### 5. Mental Revolution
**Principle**: Create a fundamental shift in the mindset of both management and workers regarding their mutual relationships and organisational goals.
**Explanation**: "Mental revolution" refers to a complete change in attitude and perception. Both managers and workers must revolutionise their thinking about management. Instead of viewing management-worker relations as inherently adversarial (workers trying to do less, management trying to pay less), both should understand that increased efficiency benefits everyone. This psychological shift is essential for implementing scientific management successfully.
**Example**: Historically, workers feared that increased productivity would lead to job losses, so they deliberately restricted output. Management viewed workers as lazy and unreliable. A "mental revolution" means workers understand that increased productivity leads to higher wages and better conditions, while management recognises that fair treatment and good wages ensure worker cooperation. This mutual trust and understanding is the foundation for scientific management implementation.
Taylor developed specific **techniques and methods** to implement scientific management principles:
#### 1. Time Study
**Definition**: A systematic study to measure the time required to complete a job or operation.
**Method**:
**Purpose**: To identify the standard time needed to complete each task, eliminating wastage of time and inefficiency.
**Example**: A company manufacturing shoes conducts a time study on the task of "stitching the sole to the upper part." By observing and recording multiple instances, they determine that this should take exactly 8 minutes per shoe. This standard time becomes the benchmark against which worker performance is measured.
#### 2. Motion Study
**Definition**: A systematic study of the movements and motions required to perform a job, aimed at eliminating unnecessary movements.
**Method**:
**Purpose**: To determine the most efficient way to perform a job by analysing and optimising workers' movements.
**Example**: In an assembly line, motion study reveals that a worker wastes time and energy by repeatedly reaching across their body for tools. By reorganising the workspace so all tools are within easy reach on the worker's dominant side, unnecessary motions are eliminated, and efficiency increases.
#### 3. Fatigue Study
**Definition**: A study to identify the causes of worker fatigue and determine the optimal balance between work and rest periods.
**Method**:
**Purpose**: To maximise worker efficiency and productivity while maintaining worker health and well-being by scientifically managing fatigue.
**Example**: A manufacturing company conducting fatigue studies finds that workers on the production line experience significant fatigue by late afternoon due to poor lighting and improper seating. By improving lighting, providing ergonomic chairs, and introducing strategic short breaks every 90 minutes, the company reduces fatigue and maintains consistent productivity throughout the day.
#### 4. Differential Piece-Rate System
**Definition**: A wage payment system that pays workers different rates based on their output, incentivising higher productivity.
**Method**:
**Purpose**: To financially incentivise workers to meet or exceed scientifically-determined standards, linking wages directly to productivity.
**Example**: A garment factory determines through time study that a skilled tailor should stitch 20 shirts per day (standard output). The differential piece-rate system pays:
This incentivises workers to reach and exceed the standard. A tailor producing 25 shirts daily earns ₹1,875 (25 × 75), while one producing only 15 shirts earns ₹750 (15 × 50), motivating higher productivity.
#### 5. Functional Foremanship
**Definition**: A supervisory system where workers report to multiple specialised supervisors (foremen) based on different functions rather than a single supervisor.
**Traditional Structure**: One foreman supervises all aspects of a worker's job.
**Functional Foremanship Structure**: A worker reports to:
**Purpose**: To ensure specialised supervision in each functional area, improving overall efficiency and reducing supervisor workload.
**Limitation**: This system often caused confusion because workers reported to multiple supervisors, creating coordination problems. It violated the principle of unity of command (one supervisor per employee), which later theorists criticised.
#### 6. Method Study
**Definition**: A systematic examination of the methods and procedures used to perform work, aimed at improving efficiency.
**Process**:
**Purpose**: To continuously improve work methods and eliminate wasteful procedures.
**Example**: A bank's method study reveals that loan processing involves unnecessary approval levels and document handling. By eliminating one approval level and digitising document handling, the bank reduces loan processing time from 10 days to 3 days.
#### 7. Simplification and Standardisation
**Definition**: The process of reducing complexity and establishing uniform standards for products, processes, and procedures.
**Simplification**: Reducing the number of variations or sizes of a product or process.
**Standardisation**: Establishing uniform standards for how tasks are performed, ensuring consistency across the organisation.
**Purpose**: To reduce complexity, improve consistency, lower costs, and increase efficiency through uniformity.
**Example**: A shoe manufacturing company initially produces 200 different designs and sizes. Simplification reduces this to 25 core designs. Standardisation ensures that all shoes of the same design meet identical quality specifications, use standardised materials, and are produced using standardised methods. This reduces production complexity and costs while maintaining quality.
**Henri Fayol**, a French mining engineer, developed the concept of **Administrative Principles** (also called **Fayol's Principles**) in the early 20th century. While Taylor focused on shop floor operations (scientific management), Fayol focused on overall organisational management and administrative functions.
#### 1. Division of Work
**Principle**: Work should be divided into small, specialised tasks, with each employee specialising in one type of work.
**Explanation**: Specialisation increases efficiency because:
**Scope**: Division of work applies to all organisational levels — workers, supervisors, managers, and executives.
**Example**: In a hospital, instead of one person handling all patient care duties, work is divided: doctors diagnose and prescribe treatment, nurses administer medicines and monitor patients, physiotherapists provide rehabilitation, and administrative staff handle paperwork. Each specialist becomes highly efficient in their area.
**Limitation**: Excessive division may lead to monotony and demotivation if jobs become too narrow.
#### 2. Authority and Responsibility
**Principle**: Authority (right to give orders) and responsibility (obligation to accomplish tasks) should be clearly defined and should go together.
**Explanation**:
**Problem**: If responsibility is given without authority, employees cannot accomplish tasks. If authority is given without responsibility, there is no accountability.
**Example**: A project manager is given responsibility to complete a project on time and within budget. To fulfil this responsibility, they should be given authority to:
Without this authority, the project manager cannot fulfil their responsibility.
#### 3. Discipline
**Principle**: All members of an organisation must obey rules, regulations, and agreements; discipline is essential for organisational functioning.
**Explanation**:
**Components**:
**Example**: An organisation establishes a rule that all employees must arrive by 9 AM. Discipline is maintained by:
#### 4. Unity of Command
**Principle**: Each employee should receive orders from only one superior, and report to only one supervisor.
**Explanation**:
**Problem**: If an employee reports to multiple supervisors, they may receive conflicting instructions, leading to confusion and conflict. Accountability becomes unclear because no one supervisor is fully responsible.
**Example**: In a manufacturing company, a production worker should report only to the production supervisor. They should not simultaneously report to the quality manager and maintenance manager (as in Taylor's functional foremanship). This ensures clarity — the production supervisor has clear authority over the worker and is responsible for their performance.
**Note**: This principle directly criticises Taylor's functional foremanship system, which violated unity of command.
#### 5. Unity of Direction
**Principle**: All activities directed towards a common objective should be unified under one plan and one manager.
**Explanation**:
**Example**: An automobile company sets a unified objective: "Become the market leader in electric vehicles within 5 years." All departments work towards this single goal:
If different departments pursued different objectives (Marketing selling traditional cars, R&D developing diesel engines, Production focused on lowering costs), the organisation would lack unity of direction.
#### 6. Subordination of Individual Interest to General Interest
**Principle**: Individual and personal interests of employees should be subordinated to the general interests of the organisation.
**Explanation**:
**Example**:
**Balance**: This doesn't mean employees should sacrifice their interests entirely. Rather, managers must create a balance where both employee and organisational interests are somewhat satisfied. Fair wages, safe working conditions, and career development help align individual and organisational interests.
#### 7. Remuneration
**Principle**: Employee remuneration (wages and salaries) should be fair, just, and reasonable, and should motivate employees while not burdening the organisation excessively.
**Explanation**:
**Factors Determining Fair Remuneration**:
**Example**: A software developer with 5 years of experience should earn more than a fresher, reflecting their greater skill and experience. Remuneration should be competitive with what other IT companies pay software developers to prevent talented developers from leaving. At the same time, the company's profitability and sustainability should not be compromised.
#### 8. Centralisation
**Principle**: There should be an appropriate balance between centralisation (concentration of authority) and decentralisation (dispersal of authority) based on organisational needs.
**Explanation**:
**Centralisation Advantages**:
**Decentralisation Advantages**:
**Example**: A multinational corporation may centralise strategic decisions (which countries to enter, which products to develop) at headquarters while decentralising operational decisions (pricing in local markets, hiring decisions) to country managers. This balance ensures strategic unity while allowing local flexibility.
#### 9. Scalar Chain (also called Chain of Command or Gangplank)
**Principle**: There should be a clear chain of authority from the highest to the lowest level of the organisation, establishing a clear line of communication and reporting.
**Explanation**:
**Gangplank Principle**: In emergency situations or when following the scalar chain would cause harmful delays, communication can "bypass" the chain (like a gangplank between two ships). However, this should be exceptional, and the bypassed supervisor should be informed.
**Example**: In an organisation with a scalar chain:
Normally, a worker seeking approval for a decision should go through their supervisor → department head → VP → CEO. However, if a customer needs immediate help in an emergency, the worker may directly contact a senior manager (bypassing the chain), and the supervisor should later be informed. This gangplank approach prevents harmful delays while maintaining general respect for the scalar chain.
#### 10. Order
**Principle**: There should be a place for everything (materials, tools, people), and everything should be in its place. Both material order and social order are essential for organisational efficiency.
**Two Types of Order**:
**Material Order**: Proper arrangement and management of physical resources:
**Social Order**: Proper arrangement of personnel and responsibilities:
**Example**:
#### 11. Equity
**Principle**: All employees should be treated with fairness, justice, and kindness. Management should show equity in dealing with employees.
**Explanation**:
**Components**:
**Example**: Two employees with similar qualifications, experience, and performance should receive similar salaries and benefits. If one is promoted over the other, the promotion should be based on objective criteria (test scores, performance appraisals) not favoritism. If one violates rules, the punishment should be consistent with the severity of violation and previous precedents, not based on whether the manager likes that employee.
#### 12. Stability of Tenure (Job Security)
**Principle**: Employees should have reasonable job security and stability of employment. High employee turnover is costly and inefficient for organisations.
**Explanation**:
**Reasonable Tenure**: This doesn't mean lifetime employment regardless of performance. It means:
**Example**: A company employing 1,000 workers should not randomly layoff 100 workers during good business times. However, during a severe economic downturn threatening the company's survival, temporary layoffs (with hope of rehiring) may be necessary. Layoffs should follow fair procedures, provide severance, and prioritise newer employees over experienced ones.
#### 13. Initiative
**Principle**: Management should encourage employees to take initiative and contribute their ideas and suggestions for improvements in organisational functioning.
**Explanation**:
**Example**: A factory worker notices that a machine is not working at optimal efficiency. With initiative, the worker suggests a modification to the machine setting. If management encourages initiative, they will:
**Contrast**: In a rigid, non-initiative organisation, the worker might notice the problem but stay silent because there's no culture of encouraging suggestions or because the
Q1. Which of the following best describes a managerial principle?
Answer: A — Managerial principles are flexible guidelines dealing with human behaviour, not rigid like pure science; they must be applied creatively based on context.
Q2. The construction of the Great Pyramid of Cheops (2900 B.C.) by 100,000 workers for 20 years demonstrates which concept?
Answer: B — The pyramid's construction shows early management of complex large-scale work through coordination and control principles, predating modern management theories.
Q3. How did the advent of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) change management principles?
Answer: B — ICT enabled managers to preside over larger, geographically dispersed workforces (e.g., Infosys managing globally from Bangalore), expanding their operational capabilities.
Q4. Which of the following is NOT a characteristic that distinguishes management principles from pure science principles?
Answer: B — Management principles are flexible, not rigid; they require creative adaptation, which is the opposite of the characteristic listed in option B.
Q5. Frederick Winslow Taylor was an American engineer who pioneered the concept of Scientific Management. Which of the following best describes his scope of focus?
Answer: C — Taylor, a mechanical engineer, focused on identifying the most efficient production methods and work processes — this is the essence of Scientific Management.
Q6. The case of Toyota Motor Corporation demonstrates that management principles serve which of the following primary purposes?
Answer: B — Toyota's 7 guiding principles show how management principles act as broad guidelines that shape both the vision and the methods to achieve global objectives.
Q7. The Neo-Classical School of management thought (1920s-1950s) developed as a response to which limitation of Classical Management Theory?
Answer: B — Neo-Classical theorists (studying Hawthorne effects) recognised that employees respond not just to economic incentives but also to social needs and human factors, which Classical theory overlooked.
Q8. A manager at Company A promotes employees based on seniority, while a manager at Company B promotes based on merit. Both decisions are justified under management principles because: Assertion (A): Management principles are flexible guidelines that adapt to situational demands. Reason (R): Human behaviour and organisational contexts are never static and require creative application of principles.
Answer: A — Both statements are true and correctly linked — management principles are flexible (A) because human behaviour and contexts are dynamic (R), justifying different applications by different managers.
Q9. The evolution of management thought includes 6 phases. Arranging them chronologically, which of the following is the INCORRECT sequence?
Answer: C — Option C incorrectly places Modern Management before Early Perspectives and Management Science before Neo-Classical Theory; the correct order is Early Perspectives → Classical → Neo-Classical → Behavioural Science → Management Science → Modern.
Q10. Henri Fayol (French mining engineer) and F.W. Taylor (American mechanical engineer) both contributed to Classical Management Theory but with different scopes. Which statement most accurately distinguishes their approaches? Statement 1: Taylor focused on finding the one best way to perform individual work tasks, while Fayol focused on how to structure the entire organisation. Statement 2: Both theorists emphasised the importance of adapting principles flexibly to every unique situation.
Answer: B — Statement 1 correctly distinguishes their scopes (Taylor = work methods, Fayol = organisation structure); Statement 2 is partially misleading — Classical theorists were more rigid; flexible adaptation is emphasised more in modern management.
What is a managerial principle?
A broad and general guideline for decision-making and behaviour that adapts to the demands of the situation.
Why are management principles NOT like pure science principles?
Because management principles deal with human behaviour which is never static, and technology changes, so they must adapt creatively to each situation.
Who gave the concept of 'Scientific Management'?
Frederick Winslow Taylor, an American mechanical engineer, pioneered the concept of Scientific Management.
Who developed 'Administrative Principles' of management?
Henri Fayol, a French mining engineer, developed Administrative Principles as the foundation of modern management.
What major historical event demonstrates early management principles in action?
The construction of the Great Pyramid of Cheops (2900 B.C.) by Egyptian ruler, which required 100,000 men for 20 years and shows principles of coordination and control at scale.
Name the 6 distinctive phases in the evolution of management thought.
Early Perspectives, Classical Management Theory, Neo-Classical Theory (Human Relations), Behavioural Science Approach (Organisational Humanism), Management Science/Operational Research, and Modern Management.
What is the core focus of the Classical Management Theory era?
Rational economic view, scientific management, administrative principles, and bureaucratic organisation during the industrial revolution and factory system.
How did Information and Communications Technology (ICT) change management principles?
ICT expanded managers' span of control from small workforces in narrow geographical areas to managing large global business empires.
What example shows the application of flexibility in management principles?
Different managers apply different principles for promotion — one follows seniority while another follows merit, both valid depending on organisational context.
According to the Toyota case, what do their 7 guiding principles demonstrate?
That management principles serve as broad guidelines for stating organisational vision and the ways to achieve it globally.
Define 'principle of management' and state one reason why management principles are not as rigid as principles of pure science. [2 marks]
Definition must include 'broad guideline for decision-making and behaviour'; reason must address human behaviour being dynamic and requiring creative application to different situations.
Explain with relevant examples how the advent of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) has changed the application of management principles. Why is flexibility in applying principles essential in modern organisations? [5 marks]
Use the Infosys example (managers interact globally from Bangalore using flat screen) to show expanded span of control; explain that ICT expanded capability but principles still adapt to context — flexibility is essential because technology and human behaviour continue to evolve.
Analyse the evolution of management thought through its 6 phases. For each phase, state the key focus or limitation it addressed. Why did management thinking move from Classical Management Theory (purely production and structure-focused) to Modern Management (complex systems approach)? Support your answer with relevant historical and conceptual reasoning. [6 marks]
Chronology: Early Perspectives (coordination at scale) → Classical (efficiency/structure) → Neo-Classical (human relations oversight) → Behavioural Science (human potential) → Management Science (quantitative tools) → Modern (contingency/complexity); explain that each phase addressed limitations of the previous one; Classical ignored human psychology, so Neo-Classical added it; conclude that modern approach integrates all dimensions.
Practice with interactive flashcards, mind maps, upload your own chapters and get AI study kits instantly
Try StudyOS Free →