StudyOSStudyOS CBSE Study Material, Class 5–12

Reshaping India's Political Map

NCERT Class 8 · Social Science Based on NCERT Class 8 Social Science textbook · Free CBSE study kit

Everything you need to ace this chapter, in one place.
Notes · Mind Map · Quiz · Assertion-Reason · Case Studies · Question Bank · Past Papers

Get Full Study Kit →
Studying with friends? Send them this chapter.

Chapter Notes

Overview
This chapter explores how foreign invasions and the rise of new dynasties reshaped India's political boundaries from the 11th to the 17th centuries. It covers the Delhi Sultanate, the Vijayanagara Empire, the Mughal Empire, and various regional powers like the Rajputs, Ahoms, and Sikhs. The one big idea a student must walk away with is that India's political map was constantly redrawn through conquests, resistance, and administrative innovations, with both brutal violence and cultural flourishing occurring side by side.
Key Concepts (13)
Delhi Sultanate
A series of five successive foreign dynasties of Turkic-Afghan origin that ruled from Delhi from 1206 to 1526, including the Mamluks, Khiljis, Tughlaqs, Sayyids, and Lodis.
e.g. Like a school where five different principals from the same family background rule one after another, but each has a different style of running the school.
Sultanate
A territory ruled by a Sultan, a title adopted by some Muslim rulers.
e.g. Just as a kingdom is ruled by a king, a sultanate is ruled by a sultan.
Iconoclasm
The rejection or destruction of icons or religious images considered idolatrous.
e.g. If someone breaks a murti in a temple because they believe worshipping images is wrong, that is iconoclasm.
Jizya
A tax imposed on non-Muslim subjects to grant them protection and exemption from military service, which was discriminatory and often a source of economic burden and public humiliation.
e.g. Imagine if in your school, students who follow one religion had to pay extra fees just to study, while others did not.
Infidel
Literally, someone who does not share the faith of a given religion. For medieval Islam, infidels were Christians or, in the Indian context, Hindus, Buddhists, or Jains.
e.g. A medieval Muslim ruler might call a Hindu temple-goer an 'infidel'.
Jauhar
The practice of Rajput women jumping into mass fires to avoid being captured and enslaved by invading armies, considered a heroic act of final resistance and preserving honour.
e.g. When Akbar's army broke into Chittorgarh Fort, hundreds of Rajput women committed jauhar to avoid capture.
Sulh-i-kul
Akbar's policy of 'peace with all' or tolerance of all faiths, which included abolishing jizya, promoting interfaith dialogues, and appointing Hindu officials.
e.g. Like a school principal who lets students of all religions celebrate their festivals equally and does not force anyone to follow one religion.
Mansabdari system
Akbar's system where officers (mansabdars) according to their rank (mansab) were expected to maintain a precise number of elephants, horses, camels, and troops for the state, allowing quick army assembly without a permanent centralised army.
e.g. Like a school where each class teacher is responsible for bringing a certain number of students for the annual day parade, and the principal checks if everyone is present.
Iqta system
A system under the Delhi Sultanate where territories were assigned to nobles (iqtadars) to collect taxes, which after expenses were sent to the Sultan's treasury, mainly to maintain the army.
e.g. Like a teacher assigning different students to collect homework from different rows and then submit it to the class monitor.
Paik system
The Ahom system where every able-bodied man provided service to the state through labour or military duty in exchange for land rights, allowing public infrastructure and a large standing force without a permanent army.
e.g. Imagine if every adult in your village had to work for the government for a few days each month in exchange for getting a piece of land to farm.
Khalsa
A martial brotherhood established by Guru Gobind Singh in 1699, committed to justice, equality, and defence of the faith, which frequently clashed with Mughal forces.
e.g. Like a special team of students who promise to always stand up for what is right and protect their classmates from bullies.
Guerrilla warfare
A style of fighting where small groups with knowledge of the terrain carry out surprise attacks and ambushes to defeat bigger armies.
e.g. Like a small group of students who know all the hidden corners of the school and use them to win a game of capture-the-flag against a much larger team.
Token currency
Cheap copper coins declared to have the value of silver or gold coins, introduced by Muhammad bin Tughlaq, which led to confusion and counterfeiting, causing economic decline.
e.g. Imagine if your school declared that a paper slip is worth ₹100, but then everyone starts making fake slips at home.
How It Works
Establishment of the Delhi Sultanate
  1. King Prithviraj Chauhan was defeated in 1192 by Turkic-Afghan invaders.
  2. Five successive foreign dynasties ruled from Delhi: Mamluks, Khiljis, Tughlaqs, Sayyids, and Lodis.
  3. The Sultanate expanded through military campaigns, plundering cities and temples.
  4. Succession was often violent, with almost two out of three sultans seizing power by eliminating their predecessor.
  5. The average reign of a sultan was hardly more than nine years.
💡 Students often forget the order of the five dynasties. Remember: MTKSL (Mamluks, Tughlaqs, Khiljis, Sayyids, Lodis) — but the correct chronological order is Mamluks, Khiljis, Tughlaqs, Sayyids, Lodis.
Muhammad bin Tughlaq's failed schemes
  1. He moved his capital from Delhi to Daulatabad (Devagiri) for better central control.
  2. People were forced to travel over 1,000 km, causing great loss of life.
  3. A few years later, he shifted the capital back to Delhi, again causing loss of life.
  4. He introduced token currency using cheap copper coins declared to have the value of silver or gold.
  5. This led to confusion in trade and encouraged counterfeiting, causing economic decline.
💡 Students often mix up the two schemes. Remember: Capital shift = loss of life. Token currency = economic decline.
Akbar's expansion and consolidation strategies
  1. Akbar declared emperor at age 13 after his father Humayun's accidental death.
  2. He used brutal military force initially, e.g., massacre at Chittor and destruction of temples.
  3. He later adopted political strategies: marriage alliances with Rajput princesses, welcoming Rajput leaders into his court.
  4. He abolished jizya and promoted sulh-i-kul (peace with all faiths).
  5. He held interfaith dialogues and appointed Hindu officials in high positions.
  6. He established a 'house of translation' at Fatehpur Sikri for translating Sanskrit texts into Persian.
💡 Students often think Akbar was always tolerant. He was brutal in early conquests and became more tolerant later for political stability.
Aurangzeb's religious policies and their impact
  1. Aurangzeb crowned himself emperor in 1658 after defeating and executing his brother Dara Shikoh.
  2. He reimposed jizya and a pilgrimage tax on Hindus, which Akbar had abolished.
  3. He banned music and dance in his court as un-Islamic.
  4. In 1669, he ordered governors to demolish schools and temples of infidels.
  5. Temples at Banaras, Mathura, Somnath, and Jain temples and Sikh gurudwaras were destroyed.
  6. He persecuted Muslims of other sects, including Sufis, and Zoroastrians.
  7. His constant wars in the Deccan depleted the empire's treasury and strained administration.
💡 Students often forget that Aurangzeb also persecuted non-Sunni Muslims, not just Hindus.
The Ahom Paik system
  1. Every able-bodied man was required to provide service to the state.
  2. Service could be labour (building infrastructure) or military duty.
  3. In exchange, the person received land rights.
  4. This allowed the king to create public infrastructure and maintain a large standing force without a permanent army.
  5. The system helped the Ahoms resist Mughal expansion.
💡 The Paik system was not just military — it also involved labour for public works.
Exam Traps — Don't Make These Mistakes
⚠ Confusing the order of Delhi Sultanate dynasties
✗ The Delhi Sultanate dynasties were: Mamluks, Tughlaqs, Khiljis, Sayyids, Lodis.
→ The correct chronological order is Mamluks (Slave dynasty), Khiljis (Khaljis), Tughlaqs, Sayyids, and Lodis. Students often mix up Khiljis and Tughlaqs.
✓ The five dynasties of the Delhi Sultanate in order are: Mamluks, Khiljis, Tughlaqs, Sayyids, and Lodis.
⚠ Thinking Akbar was always tolerant
✗ Akbar was a tolerant ruler who never harmed anyone and always promoted peace.
→ Akbar's early conquests were brutal. At Chittor, he ordered the massacre of 30,000 civilians and destroyed temples. He became more tolerant later for political reasons.
✓ Akbar's reign was a blend of brutality and tolerance. He was ruthless in early conquests but later adopted sulh-i-kul (peace with all) for political stability.
⚠ Mixing up Muhammad bin Tughlaq's schemes
✗ Muhammad bin Tughlaq moved his capital to Daulatabad and introduced token currency, both of which succeeded.
→ Both schemes failed. The capital shift caused great loss of life, and token currency led to counterfeiting and economic decline.
✓ Muhammad bin Tughlaq's schemes failed: the capital shift to Daulatabad caused loss of life, and token currency led to counterfeiting and economic decline.
⚠ Confusing jizya with other taxes
✗ Jizya was a tax on all subjects to fund the army.
→ Jizya was specifically a tax on non-Muslim subjects, not all subjects. It was discriminatory and meant to grant protection and exemption from military service.
✓ Jizya was a discriminatory tax imposed on non-Muslim subjects to grant them protection and exemption from military service.
⚠ Thinking the Mughals and Delhi Sultanate were the same
✗ The Mughal Empire was the same as the Delhi Sultanate.
→ The Delhi Sultanate (1206-1526) was a series of Turkic-Afghan dynasties. The Mughal Empire (1526-1857) was founded by Babur, a Turkic-Mongol ruler, and was a separate empire.
✓ The Delhi Sultanate and the Mughal Empire were two different political entities. The Mughal Empire began when Babur defeated Ibrahim Lodi at the First Battle of Panipat in 1526.
Compare & Contrast
System of assigning land/tax collection to officials
Delhi Sultanate administration (Iqta system)
Mughal administration (Mansabdari system)
In the Iqta system, iqtadars collected taxes and sent them to the Sultan's treasury, and posts were not hereditary. In the Mansabdari system, mansabdars maintained a fixed number of troops and animals for the state, and were paid through jagirs (land assignments).
Treatment of non-Muslims and other faiths
Akbar's religious policy
Aurangzeb's religious policy
Akbar abolished jizya, promoted sulh-i-kul (peace with all), appointed Hindu officials, and translated Hindu texts. Aurangzeb reimposed jizya, destroyed temples and gurudwaras, banned music in court, and persecuted non-Muslims and non-Sunni Muslims.
Political relationship and rivalry
Vijayanagara Empire
Bahmani Sultanate
The Vijayanagara Empire and the Bahmani Sultanate were major rivals in the Deccan. The Bahmani Sultanate later fragmented into five Deccan Sultanates (Bijapur, Golconda, Berar, Ahmednagar, Bidar), which eventually formed a coalition and defeated Vijayanagara at the Battle of Talikota in 1565.
Exam Focus
Marks pattern: Typically 2-3 MCQs (1 mark each), 1-2 Short Answer questions (2-3 marks), and 1 Long Answer question (5 marks) on comparative analysis of rulers or administrative systems.
Most asked: Delhi Sultanate dynasties and their key rulers · Muhammad bin Tughlaq's schemes and their failure · Akbar's policies (sulh-i-kul, mansabdari system, religious tolerance) · Aurangzeb's religious policies and their impact · Vijayanagara Empire under Krishnadevaraya · Resistance to Mughals: Rajputs, Ahoms, Sikhs · Jizya and its implications · Battle of Panipat (First and Second) · Battle of Talikota · Administrative systems (Iqta, Mansabdari, Paik)
Don't skip: Compare and contrast Akbar's and Aurangzeb's religious policies (5 marks); Explain the administrative systems of the Delhi Sultanate and the Mughals (5 marks); Describe the resistance offered by regional powers like the Rajputs, Ahoms, and Sikhs to the Mughals (5 marks); Analyse the reasons for the decline of the Delhi Sultanate and the rise of the Mughal Empire (5 marks)
One-Line Revision (read aloud before the exam)
  1. The Delhi Sultanate consisted of five dynasties in order: Mamluks, Khiljis, Tughlaqs, Sayyids, and Lodis.
  2. Muhammad bin Tughlaq's failed schemes included moving the capital to Daulatabad and introducing token currency.
  3. Ala-ud-din Khilji called himself 'the second Alexander' and conducted military campaigns across north and central India.
  4. The Vijayanagara Empire was founded by Harihara and Bukka and reached its peak under Krishnadevaraya.
  5. The Battle of Talikota in 1565 led to the destruction of Vijayanagara city by a coalition of Deccan Sultanates.
  6. Babur defeated Ibrahim Lodi at the First Battle of Panipat in 1526, establishing the Mughal Empire.
  7. Akbar promoted sulh-i-kul (peace with all), abolished jizya, and appointed Hindu officials in his court.
  8. Aurangzeb reimposed jizya, destroyed temples, and persecuted non-Muslims and non-Sunni Muslims.
  9. The Mansabdari system required officers to maintain a fixed number of troops and animals for the state.
  10. The Ahom Paik system required every able-bodied man to provide labour or military service in exchange for land.
  11. Guru Gobind Singh established the Khalsa in 1699 as a martial brotherhood committed to justice and equality.
  12. Maharana Pratap used guerrilla warfare from the Aravalli hills to resist Mughal dominance.
  13. The Battle of Saraighat in 1671 saw the Ahoms defeat a larger Mughal force under Lachit Borphukan.
  14. Jizya was a discriminatory tax on non-Muslim subjects, abolished by Akbar and reimposed by Aurangzeb.
  15. The Delhi Sultanate's average reign was about nine years, while Mughal emperors averaged 27 years up to Aurangzeb.

MCQs — 10 Questions with Answers

Q1. The Delhi Sultanate was established after the defeat of which ruler in 1192?

  • A. King Prithviraj Chauhan ✓
  • B. Narasimhadeva I
  • C. Muhammad bin Tughlaq
  • D. Ala-ud-din Khilji

Answer: A — King Prithviraj Chauhan ruled northwestern India and was defeated in 1192, leading to the establishment of the Delhi Sultanate.

Q2. Which dynasty was known as the 'Slave dynasty' of the Delhi Sultanate?

  • A. Khiljis
  • B. Mamluks ✓
  • C. Tughlaqs
  • D. Sayyids

Answer: B — The Mamluks were also called the 'Slave dynasty' and were the first dynasty to rule the Delhi Sultanate.

Q3. The term 'medieval' was originally applied to which region's history?

  • A. Asian history
  • B. Indian history
  • C. European history ✓
  • D. African history

Answer: C — The term 'medieval' was originally applied to European history from the fall of the Roman Empire to the Renaissance, roughly from the 5th to 16th centuries.

Q4. What did Ala-ud-din Khilji call himself on his coins?

  • A. Ruler of Delhi
  • B. Sikander Sani (the second Alexander) ✓
  • C. Conqueror of the South
  • D. Emperor of Hindustan

Answer: B — Ala-ud-din Khilji called himself 'Sikander Sani' or 'the second Alexander' because of his extensive military campaigns across north and central India.

Q5. Muhammad bin Tughlaq's token currency policy failed mainly because:

  • A. There was no demand for currency at that time
  • B. People counterfeited the cheap copper coins and trade was disrupted ✓
  • C. The nobles refused to accept it
  • D. It was too advanced for medieval times

Answer: B — The token currency created confusion in trade and encouraged people to counterfeit copper coins, which caused the economy to decline.

Q6. The jizya tax was primarily imposed on which group?

  • A. All subjects regardless of religion
  • B. Non-Muslim subjects ✓
  • C. Hindu merchants only
  • D. Soldiers and their families

Answer: B — The jizya was a discriminatory tax imposed on non-Muslim subjects by sultans to grant them protection and exemption from military service.

Q7. If the Delhi Sultanate controlled most of the Indian subcontinent like the Mauryan Empire, why did it not last as long?

  • A. Because it faced constant invasions from outside India
  • B. Because the sultanate's dominance was short-lived due to poor administration and resistance from other states ✓
  • C. Because the sultans were not interested in maintaining the empire
  • D. Because the economy was too weak to support such a large territory

Answer: B — Although Muhammad bin Tughlaq expanded the Delhi Sultanate to cover most of the subcontinent, this dominance proved to be short-lived due to poor execution of plans and increasing resistance from other states and kingdoms.

Q8. The Eastern Gangas kingdom successfully resisted the Delhi Sultanate because:

  • A. It had stronger military weapons
  • B. It was located far in the east and had significant military strength and cultural development ✓
  • C. The sultans were not interested in conquering eastern India
  • D. It had alliances with the Hoysalas and other southern kingdoms

Answer: B — The Eastern Ganga kingdom of Kalinga, which included present-day Odisha, had military strength that enabled it to resist the Delhi Sultanate's advances.

Q9. Timur's 1398 invasion of Delhi can be seen as similar to modern invasions because both involve:

  • A. Religious conversion of the local population
  • B. Plunder of wealth combined with destruction and establishment of a new rule ✓
  • C. Introduction of new agricultural methods
  • D. Building of new monuments and infrastructure

Answer: B — Timur's invasion involved plundering wealth, killing people, enslaving populations, and leaving chaos — similar to how invasions cause destruction and resource extraction in modern conflicts.

Q10. When Muhammad bin Tughlaq moved his capital from Delhi to Daulatabad, what does this tell us about political decision-making in the sultanate?

  • A. That sultans made decisions based purely on logic and geography
  • B. That ambitious schemes without proper planning could cause mass suffering and economic loss ✓
  • C. That Delhi was no longer important for controlling the empire
  • D. That the sultanate had successfully conquered southern India

Answer: B — The failed capital transfer resulted in great loss of life and economic disruption, showing that despite good intentions, poor planning in government decisions harms ordinary people.

Flashcards

Who defeated King Prithviraj Chauhan in 1192 and established the Delhi Sultanate?

Muhammad of Ghur defeated Prithviraj Chauhan in 1192, after which the Delhi Sultanate was formed by his generals.

Name the five dynasties that ruled the Delhi Sultanate.

The five dynasties were: Mamluks (Slave dynasty), Khiljis, Tughlaqs, Sayyids, and Lodis.

What was the average length of a sultan's reign during the Delhi Sultanate?

The average reign was hardly more than nine years because almost two out of three sultans seized power by eliminating their predecessor.

What title did Ala-ud-din Khilji use for himself and why?

Ala-ud-din Khilji called himself 'Sikander Sani' or 'the second Alexander' because he conducted extensive military campaigns over large areas of north and central India, similar to Alexander the Great.

What was Muhammad bin Tughlaq's failed policy regarding currency?

He introduced 'token currency' where cheap copper coins were declared to have the value of silver or gold coins, which created confusion and encouraged counterfeiting, causing economic decline.

What was the jizya tax and who had to pay it?

The jizya was a discriminatory tax imposed on non-Muslim subjects by sultans to grant them protection and exemption from military service.

Which two kingdoms in the south and east successfully resisted the Delhi Sultanate?

The Eastern Gangas in the east and the Hoysalas in the south resisted the Delhi Sultanate's advance and emerged as thriving centres of art, culture, and administration.

Who was Malik Kafur and what did he accomplish?

Malik Kafur was Ala-ud-din Khilji's slave-general who expanded the Sultanate's reach southward by conquering several kingdoms and plundering temples like Srirangam and Madurai.

What were the two objectives of Timur's 1398 invasion of Delhi?

Timur's two-fold objective was to wage 'war with the infidels' and to gain wealth by plundering the riches of Delhi.

Why did Muhammad bin Tughlaq move his capital from Delhi to Daulatabad?

He wanted to shift the capital to Daulatabad's more central location to offer better control of his empire, but the plan misfired and caused great loss of life.

Important Board Questions

In what year was the Delhi Sultanate established, and which ruler was defeated to establish it? [1 mark]

The event occurred in 1192. King Prithviraj Chauhan was the ruler who was defeated.

Why did Muhammad bin Tughlaq's token currency policy fail? Explain with one example of its consequence. [2 marks]

Token currency meant cheap copper coins declared to have value of precious metals. This led to counterfeiting and disruption of trade, causing economic decline.

Describe three ways in which the Delhi Sultanate's rule affected the lives of common people in India during this period. [3 marks]

Consider: military raids and plunder disrupted trade and agriculture; jizya tax burden on non-Muslims; destruction of temples and cultural centers; forced migration during capital shift; enslavement for slave trade.

Analyze how the Delhi Sultanate's focus on military expansion and plunder ultimately weakened its own stability and economic base. Use specific examples from the chapter. [5 marks]

Include: violent successions (9-year average reign); plunder disrupted trade networks and agricultural production; Ala-ud-din Khilji's campaigns required enormous military expenditure; Muhammad bin Tughlaq's failed policies; resistance from kingdoms like Eastern Gangas and Hoysalas; Timur's destruction of Delhi; Lodis faced a shrunk territory.

Assertion-Reason Questions for Reshaping India's Political Map

Q1. Assertion (A):

The Delhi Sultanate was marked by political instability and violent power transfers.

Reason (R):

Almost two sultans out of three seized power by eliminating their predecessors, resulting in an average reign of barely more than nine years.

Answer: A — Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A — Both statements are true, and the reason directly explains why the Sultanate was politically unstable. The frequent violent successions and short reigns are the factual basis for the assertion about instability.

Q2. Assertion (A):

Ala-ud-din Khilji's military campaigns significantly expanded the Delhi Sultanate's territorial reach and wealth.

Reason (R):

He expanded the Sultanate southward through his slave-general Malik Kafur, whose plundered wealth helped finance the military apparatus.

Answer: B — Both A and R are true, but R is NOT the correct explanation of A — Both statements are true - Ala-ud-din did conduct campaigns in north and central India, and Malik Kafur did expand southward with plundered wealth. However, the reason is not the complete explanation for Ala-ud-din's own campaigns in the north and his repulsion of Mongol invasions. The reason explains only part of his success.

Q3. Assertion (A):

The Vijayanagara Empire was established as a direct response to the Delhi Sultanate's territorial expansion.

Reason (R):

The Vijayanagara Empire was established in 1336, during a period when the Tughlaq Dynasty controlled much of northern India.

Answer: C — A is true but R is false — The assertion suggests direct causation between the Sultanate's expansion and Vijayanagara's founding, which the chapter does not support. The reason is true (the dates and coexistence are accurate), but it doesn't prove causation. The chapter presents them as separate regional powers, not as a direct cause-and-effect relationship.

Unlock more Assertion-Reason questions in Premium — unlock →

Case-Based Questions (CBQ) for Reshaping India's Political Map

Case Study:

A history research team studied the territories controlled by different Delhi Sultanate dynasties using archaeological evidence and historical records. Their findings showed that the Tughlaq Dynasty (1335) controlled approximately 3.5 million square kilometers of territory in the Indian subcontinent, including much of northern, central, and eastern regions. By the time of the Lodi Dynasty (1479), the controlled territory had decreased to approximately 2.2 million square kilometers, with significant losses in southern and eastern areas. This territorial contraction reflected the growing power of regional kingdoms like the Vijayanagara Empire and the Bahmani Sultanate, which had established independent rule in areas the Tughlaqs had once dominated.

Q1. What does the decrease in Tughlaq to Lodi territorial control indicate about the Delhi Sultanate's political trajectory?

  • A. The Sultanate expanded its control and became stronger over time
  • B. The Sultanate experienced territorial decline and weakening political authority between 1335-1479 ✓
  • C. Regional kingdoms became less powerful and more subordinate to Delhi
  • D. The Sultanate's administration became more efficient despite smaller territory

Answer: B

Q2. Which factor best explains the loss of southern territories mentioned in the passage?

  • A. Voluntary abandonment by the Delhi Sultanate for economic reasons
  • B. The rise of independent regional powers like Vijayanagara and Bahmani Sultanates that claimed these areas ✓
  • C. Natural disasters and famines that depopulated the southern regions
  • D. The arrival of Portuguese traders who claimed southern territories for Europe

Answer: B

Q3. How many square kilometers of territory did the Delhi Sultanate lose between the Tughlaq and Lodi periods?

  • A. Approximately 1.3 million square kilometers ✓
  • B. Approximately 2.2 million square kilometers
  • C. Approximately 3.5 million square kilometers
  • D. Approximately 5.7 million square kilometers

Answer: A

Q4. Based on this territorial data, what would have been the likely impact on the Sultanate's military and economic capacity?

  • A. Increased capacity due to controlling more densely populated areas
  • B. No significant change as territory size doesn't affect military strength
  • C. Reduced capacity due to loss of tax-generating regions and military resources ✓
  • D. Improved capacity as smaller territories required fewer resources to administer

Answer: C

Unlock more case studies in Premium — unlock →

Next chapterThe Rise of the Marathas →
Found this useful? Share it with your class group.

You've seen the free preview. Open the full interactive study kit — mind map, instant-graded quiz, progress tracking — free, no sign-in required.

Open Full Study Kit — Free →

Premium unlocks the full Question Bank, Daily Practice Papers, Chapter Quiz and Full Mock Papers for every chapter.