Everything you need to ace this chapter, in one place.
Notes · Mind Map · Quiz · Assertion-Reason · Case Studies · Question Bank · Past Papers
Q1. Let A = {1, 2, 3}. Which of the following is the empty relation on A?
Answer: A — No pair (a, b) in A × A satisfies a − b = 10 since the maximum difference is 3 − 1 = 2, making the relation empty; all other options contain at least one pair.
Q2. Which property does the relation R = {(a, b) ∈ Z : a = b} satisfy?
Answer: D — Equality is reflexive (a = a), symmetric (a = b ⟹ b = a), and transitive (a = b and b = c ⟹ a = c), making it an equivalence relation.
Q3. Let R be a relation in set {1, 2, 3, 4} defined as R = {(1,2), (2,1), (2,3), (3,2)}. Is R symmetric? Is R transitive?
Answer: B — R is symmetric because (1,2) ∈ R and (2,1) ∈ R, (2,3) ∈ R and (3,2) ∈ R; R is not transitive because (1,2) ∈ R and (2,3) ∈ R but (1,3) ∉ R.
Q4. The relation R = {(a, b) ∈ Z : 2 divides (a + b)} on set Z. Which statement is NOT correct?
Answer: C — R is not transitive: if a = 1, b = 1, then a + b = 2 (divisible by 2); if b = 1, c = 2, then b + c = 3 (not divisible by 2), showing transitivity fails.
Q5. Assertion (A): The relation 'is parallel to' on the set of all lines in a plane is an equivalence relation. Reason (R): A relation is an equivalence relation if it is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.
Answer: C — R is true (definition of equivalence relation), but A is false because 'parallel to' is not reflexive (a line is not parallel to itself by standard definition, it coincides with itself).
Q6. Let T be the set of all triangles in a plane and R be 'is similar to' on T. Verify: R is reflexive, R is symmetric, and R is transitive. Which of the following is true?
Answer: C — Reflexive: every triangle is similar to itself; symmetric: T₁ ~ T₂ ⟹ T₂ ~ T₁; transitive: T₁ ~ T₂ and T₂ ~ T₃ ⟹ T₁ ~ T₃; hence R is an equivalence relation.
Q7. For the relation R in Z given by R = {(a, b) : 3 divides (a − b)}, the equivalence class of 2 is:
Answer: A — [2] contains all integers b such that 3 divides (b − 2), i.e., b ≡ 2 (mod 3), giving {..., −4, −1, 2, 5, 8, ...}.
Q8. Which of the following relations on the set {1, 2, 3, 4} is NOT a function from the set to itself?
Answer: D — Option D fails the function property because the element 2 maps to both 1 and 3 (not single-valued); options A, B, C each assign exactly one output to each input.
Q9. Consider R = {(a, b) ∈ N × N : a divides b}. Check each property: (i) reflexive? (ii) symmetric? (iii) transitive?
Answer: B — Reflexive: a | a ✓; symmetric: if a | b, does b | a? Only if a = b, so ✗; transitive: if a | b and b | c, then a | c ✓.
Q10. HOTS: A relation R on set A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5} is defined by R = {(a, b) : both a and b are odd}. Show that R is reflexive and symmetric. Is it transitive? If not, find a counterexample and explain why it fails.
Answer: C — Reflexive: (a, a) ∈ R only if a is odd (holds for odd a); symmetric: if both a, b are odd then both b, a are odd ✓; transitive: (1,3) ∈ R (both odd) and (3,5) ∈ R (both odd) imply (1,5) ∈ R (both odd) ✓, so actually R IS transitive.
What is a relation R from set A to set B mathematically?
Any arbitrary subset of A × B; written as R ⊆ A × B, where (a, b) ∈ R means a is related to b.
Define reflexive relation with an example.
A relation R in set A is reflexive if (a, a) ∈ R for every a ∈ A; example: equality relation {(a, a) : a ∈ A}.
What makes a relation symmetric? Give one example.
A relation is symmetric if (a₁, a₂) ∈ R implies (a₂, a₁) ∈ R; example: congruence of triangles where T₁ ≅ T₂ implies T₂ ≅ T₁.
Define transitive relation and give a counterexample.
Transitive: (a₁, a₂) and (a₂, a₃) ∈ R implies (a₁, a₃) ∈ R; counterexample: perpendicularity of lines (L₁ ⊥ L₂ and L₂ ⊥ L₃ does not imply L₁ ⊥ L₃).
What is an equivalence relation? Name all three required properties.
A relation that is simultaneously reflexive, symmetric, and transitive; these three properties together define an equivalence relation.
Show that 'congruence of triangles' is an equivalence relation.
Reflexive: every triangle is congruent to itself; symmetric: T₁ ≅ T₂ ⟹ T₂ ≅ T₁; transitive: T₁ ≅ T₂ and T₂ ≅ T₃ ⟹ T₁ ≅ T₃.
For R = {(a, b) ∈ Z : 2 divides (a − b)}, prove R is reflexive.
For any a ∈ Z, 2 divides (a − a) = 0, so (a, a) ∈ R for all a; hence R is reflexive.
What are equivalence classes? Explain using even and odd integers.
Equivalence classes are disjoint subsets created by an equivalence relation; for integers: [0] = all even integers, [1] = all odd integers, partitioning Z completely.
Identify which property the relation 'perpendicularity of lines' satisfies.
Only symmetric: L₁ ⊥ L₂ ⟹ L₂ ⊥ L₁; not reflexive (no line ⊥ itself) and not transitive (L₁ ⊥ L₂ and L₂ ⊥ L₃ means L₁ ∥ L₃, not L₁ ⊥ L₃).
What conditions must equivalence classes satisfy for any equivalence relation?
All elements within each class are related; no element from one class relates to any element of another; classes are disjoint and their union equals the entire set.
Define an empty relation and a universal relation. Give one example of each on the set {1, 2, 3}. [2 marks]
Empty relation has no pairs: state R = φ and verify no (a, b) satisfies the condition. Universal relation: R = A × A with a simple example like |a − b| ≥ 0 or a ∈ A, b ∈ A.
Prove that the relation R = {(a, b) ∈ Z : 2 divides (a − b)} is an equivalence relation. Then identify the two equivalence classes and describe what integers they contain. [5 marks]
For reflexivity, show 2 | (a − a); for symmetry, if 2 | (a − b) then 2 | (b − a); for transitivity, sum two even differences. Equivalence classes: [0] = all even integers, [1] = all odd integers; verify they partition Z.
State the definition of reflexive, symmetric, and transitive relations. Using the relation 'perpendicularity of lines' in a plane, determine which properties it satisfies and which it does not. Justify each answer with a reason or counterexample. [6 marks]
Define all three properties precisely. For perpendicularity: not reflexive (a line cannot be ⊥ to itself), symmetric (if L₁ ⊥ L₂ then L₂ ⊥ L₁), and not transitive (if L₁ ⊥ L₂ and L₂ ⊥ L₃, then L₁ ∥ L₃, not L₁ ⊥ L₃); use counterexample with three lines to show failure of transitivity.
Q1. Assertion (A):
The relation R = {(a, b) : a – b is divisible by 3} in the set Z is an equivalence relation.
Reason (R):
The relation R satisfies reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity properties simultaneously.
Answer: A — Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A — Both the assertion and reason are true. For reflexivity: 3|(a–a)=0. For symmetry: if 3|(a–b) then 3|(b–a). For transitivity: if 3|(a–b) and 3|(b–c), then 3|((a–b)+(b–c))=(a–c). The reason correctly explains why the assertion is true.
Q2. Assertion (A):
In any set A, the relation R = {(a, b) : a = b} is an equivalence relation.
Reason (R):
This relation contains exactly |A| ordered pairs and is reflexive.
Answer: B — Both A and R are true, but R is NOT the correct explanation of A — The assertion is true: this is the identity relation, which is reflexive (a=a), symmetric (if a=b then b=a), and transitive (if a=b and b=c then a=c). The reason is also true—it does contain |A| pairs and is reflexive—but it doesn't explain why it's an equivalence relation. The reason misses symmetry and transitivity, so while both statements are true, the reason is not the correct explanation.
Q3. Assertion (A):
The relation R = {(L₁, L₂) : L₁ is parallel to L₂} in the set of all lines in a plane is an equivalence relation.
Reason (R):
Parallelism is transitive because if L₁ || L₂ and L₂ || L₃, then L₁ || L₃ necessarily.
Answer: C — A is true but R is false — The assertion is true—this relation is indeed reflexive (a line is parallel to itself), symmetric (if L₁||L₂ then L₂||L₁), and transitive. However, the reason is incomplete and misleading. While transitivity is correctly stated, the reason doesn't mention reflexivity or symmetry, which are equally essential for being an equivalence relation. The reason only justifies one property.
Unlock more Assertion-Reason questions in Premium — unlock →
Case Study:
A school organises a blood donation camp. The medical team classifies donors into groups based on their blood type: A, B, AB, and O. They define a relation R among donors as 'Donor X can receive blood from Donor Y' based on compatibility rules. According to medical protocols: Type O can donate to all types (universal donor), Type AB can receive from all types (universal recipient), Type A can receive from A and O, and Type B can receive from B and O. The relation is examined to understand its mathematical properties for designing the camp's distribution system.
Q1. Is the relation R (where a R b means 'Donor a can give blood to Donor b') reflexive in the set of all donors?
Answer: A
Q2. Is the relation R symmetric? That is, if Donor a can give to Donor b, can Donor b necessarily give to Donor a?
Answer: B
Q3. Which property would make R an equivalence relation unsuitable for blood donation?
Answer: B
Q4. If we partition donors based on 'same blood type compatibility class', how many equivalence classes would exist?
Answer: D
Unlock more case studies in Premium — unlock →
Real CBSE board exam questions from past papers — free to attempt.
CBSE 2026 · Set 65/1/1 · 5 marks
A relation R is defined on Z, the set of integers, as R = {(x, y) : |x – y| is divisible by a prime number 'p', x, y ∈ Z}. Check whether R is an equivalence relation or not.
CBSE 2026 · Set 65/1/2 · 5 marks
A relation R is defined on ℤ, the set of integers, as R = {(x, y) : |x – y| is divisible by a prime number 'p', x, y ∈ ℤ}. Check whether R is an equivalence relation or not.
CBSE 2026 · Set 65/1/3 · 5 marks
A relation R is defined on Z, the set of integers, as R = {(x, y): |x – y| is divisible by a prime number 'p', x, y ∈ Z}. Check whether R is an equivalence relation or not.
CBSE 2026 · Set 65/2/1 · 1 mark
A relation R on set A = {1, 2, 3} defined as R = {(1, 1), (2, 2), (1, 2)} is
CBSE 2026 · Set 65/2/1 · 2 marks
Check whether f : ℝ – {3} → ℝ defined as f(x) = (x² - 2)/(x - 3) is onto or not.
CBSE 2026 · Set 65/2/2 · 1 mark
A relation R on set A = {1, 2, 3} defined as R = {(1, 2), (2, 1), (2, 2)} is
CBSE 2026 · Set 65/2/2 · 2 marks
Check whether f: ℝ – {3} → ℝ defined as f(x) = (x – 2)/(x – 3) is onto or not.
CBSE 2026 · Set 65(B) R Mathematics · 1 mark
Let f : ℝ → ℝ be a function defined as f(x) = x³, then f is :
CBSE 2026 · Set 65(B) R Mathematics · 1 mark
Two friends Ramesh and Divya have started playing Ludo at their house. While rolling the die, they observed each time, that the possible outcomes are {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}. Let A be the set of players and B be the set of all possible outcomes, so A = {Ramesh, Divya} and B = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}. Let relation R : B → B be defined as R = {(x, y) : y is divisible by x}.
Let relation R : B → B be defined as R = {(x, y) : y is divisible by x}. Write all elements of R.
CBSE 2026 · Set 65/2/3 · 1 mark
A relation R on set A = {1, 2, 3} is defined as R = {(1, 3), (3, 3), (1, 1), (2, 2), (3, 1)} is
CBSE 2026 · Set 65/2/3 · 2 marks
Check whether f : R – {3} → R defined as f(x) = (x - 2)/(x - 3) is onto or not.
CBSE 2026 · Set 65/3/1 · 5 marks
Show that f : R → R defined as f(x) = x2/(1 + x2) is one-one but not onto.
See all 64 board PYQs for this chapter — open PYQ tab →
Every formula from all 13 chapters on one page, checked against the NCERT textbook and the CBSE 2026-27 syllabus. Free PDF download.
All 1048 CBSE board questions from 2022–2026, sorted by chapter and question type. Free PDF download.
You've seen the free preview. Open the full interactive study kit — mind map, instant-graded quiz, progress tracking — free, no sign-in required.
Open Full Study Kit — Free →Premium unlocks the full Question Bank, Daily Practice Papers, Chapter Quiz and Full Mock Papers for every chapter.