Everything you need to ace this chapter, in one place.
Notes · Mind Map · Quiz · Assertion-Reason · Case Studies · Question Bank · Past Papers
Q1. Dobereiner's Law of Triads applies to which set of elements?
Answer: A — Li (7), Na (23), K (39): Na's atomic weight (23) is approximately the average of Li (7) and K (39), exemplifying Dobereiner's Triad principle exactly.
Q2. Newlands' Law of Octaves failed because it worked only up to which element?
Answer: C — Newlands observed the octave pattern (every 8th element similar to the 1st) held true only until calcium; beyond calcium, the pattern broke down.
Q3. What key decision did Mendeleev make that Newlands did not?
Answer: B — Mendeleev prioritized chemical properties (similar empirical formulas) over strict atomic weight order, placed iodine before tellurium, and predicted gallium and germanium to fill gaps—revolutionary bold predictions.
Q4. Which statement correctly explains why the Modern Periodic Law uses atomic number instead of atomic weight?
Answer: B — Electronic configuration (determined by atomic number alone) directly causes periodic repetition of chemical properties; atomic weight does not determine electron configuration uniquely (isotopes).
Q5. The prediction of Eka-Aluminium by Mendeleev was later confirmed when which element was discovered?
Answer: B — Mendeleev left a gap under aluminium (Group 13) and called it Eka-Aluminium; this was confirmed as gallium when discovered, validating Mendeleev's predictive power.
Q6. Assertion: Mendeleev placed iodine (At. wt. 127) before tellurium (At. wt. 128) in his periodic table. Reason: Iodine's chemical properties are similar to fluorine and chlorine (halogens).
Answer: A — Mendeleev did place I before Te despite I having higher atomic weight because I belongs to Group VII (halogens like F and Cl), demonstrating that chemical property similarity trumped weight order.
Q7. Which of the following is NOT a key characteristic that Mendeleev used to classify elements?
Answer: D — Mendeleev relied on atomic weight, empirical formulas, and physical/chemical properties; mass number (total protons + neutrons) was not used and is largely irrelevant for periodic classification.
Q8. If an element X has atomic number 19 and element Y has atomic number 20, how many valence electrons does Y have if X is potassium (Group 1)?
Answer: B — Potassium (K, Z=19) is in Group 1 with 1 valence electron; the next element (Z=20) is calcium in Group 2 with 2 valence electrons, following the periodic trend of increasing valence electrons across a period.
Q9. Between Newlands and Mendeleev, which scientist's work was eventually awarded the Davy Medal by the Royal Society, London?
Answer: A — Newlands' Law of Octaves, initially dismissed, was recognized 22 years later when he was awarded the Davy Medal in 1887; Mendeleev received other honors but not specified here as the primary one.
Q10. HOTS: A new element with atomic number 115 is discovered. Based on the Modern Periodic Law and periodic trends, predict which group it most likely belongs to and justify.
Answer: B — Element 115 (Moscovium) has configuration [Rn]5f¹⁴6d¹⁰7s²7p³, with 5 valence electrons in 7p, placing it in Group 15; this demonstrates that atomic number determines electronic configuration, which determines group placement via periodicity.
What was Dobereiner's Law of Triads and when was it proposed?
In 1829, Dobereiner noted that groups of three elements showed similar properties, with the middle element's atomic weight approximately halfway between the other two.
State Newlands' Law of Octaves.
Every eighth element in increasing order of atomic weights possessed properties similar to the first element, resembling octaves in music (true only up to calcium).
What is the Modern Periodic Law?
The properties of elements are a periodic function of their atomic number (not atomic weight, as Mendeleev originally stated).
Why did Mendeleev ignore atomic weight order in his periodic table?
He placed elements with similar properties together and predicted undiscovered elements would fill gaps, prioritizing chemical similarities over strict weight order.
Name the two elements Mendeleev predicted and left gaps for in his table.
Mendeleev predicted Eka-Aluminium (gallium) and Eka-Silicon (germanium) and left gaps under aluminium and silicon respectively.
What is the significance of atomic number in modern periodic classification?
Atomic number determines electronic configuration, which repeats periodically and causes the periodic repetition of chemical and physical properties.
How does electronic configuration justify periodic trends?
Elements in the same group have identical valence electron configurations, explaining similar chemical properties; periodicity arises from repeating patterns in filling electron shells.
Name the four blocks of the periodic table and what they represent.
s, p, d, and f blocks represent the subshells being filled: s (2 electrons max), p (6 electrons), d (10 electrons), and f (14 electrons).
Why is the periodic table called 'the everyday support for students'?
It organizes all 114 known elements into predictable groups and families, allowing rapid prediction of properties without studying each element individually.
How did Lothar Meyer contribute differently from Mendeleev?
Meyer plotted physical properties (atomic volume, melting point, boiling point) against atomic weight and discovered periodically repeated patterns, but Mendeleev published first and is credited.
State Mendeleev's Periodic Law and explain why he violated the strict order of atomic weights in his periodic table with one example. [2 marks]
Define the periodic law clearly; then explain that Mendeleev prioritized chemical properties (similar compounds) over weight order and cite iodine (127) placed before tellurium (128) because iodine forms halides like fluorine and chlorine.
Explain how the Modern Periodic Law (based on atomic number) overcomes the limitations of Mendeleev's Periodic Law (based on atomic weight). Illustrate with the case of iodine and tellurium. [5 marks]
Show that atomic number uniquely determines electronic configuration and valence electrons; explain that isotopes have different mass numbers but same atomic number (same chemistry); prove that I (Z=53, Group 17) and Te (Z=52, Group 16) now fit correctly by atomic number, not weight—atomic number reflects electron configuration which truly governs periodicity. Use the example to show why modern approach is superior.
Mendeleev left gaps in his periodic table and predicted the existence of undiscovered elements with specific properties. Critically analyze his predictions for Eka-Aluminium and Eka-Silicon: (a) Why did Mendeleev leave these gaps? (b) Which elements confirmed his predictions? (c) What does this success reveal about the predictive power of the periodic table as a scientific tool? [6 marks]
Part (a): He observed gaps between known elements with similar properties, so he hypothesized undiscovered elements would fill them. Part (b): Eka-Al = Ga, Eka-Si = Ge. Part (c): Explain that periodic classification is not arbitrary but reflects a deep underlying order (electronic configuration); the periodic table becomes predictive because properties recur systematically—this validates that the periodic law is a fundamental principle of chemistry, not just a convenient catalog. Connect to modern synthesis of new elements beyond uranium.
Q1. Assertion (A):
Dobereiner's Law of Triads was eventually dismissed as coincidence despite identifying a genuine periodic relationship.
Reason (R):
The Law of Triads successfully classified all elements known in the early 1800s into groups with predictable properties.
Answer: C — A is true but R is false — The assertion is true—Dobereiner's work was dismissed due to its limited scope, but it did reveal a genuine pattern. The reason is false because the Law only worked for a few elements, not all known elements. A true reason would explain why limited success led to dismissal.
Q2. Assertion (A):
Mendeleev prioritized chemical property similarities over strict adherence to atomic weight order when arranging elements.
Reason (R):
This priority allowed him to place chemically similar elements in the same group and leave gaps for undiscovered elements with predictable properties.
Answer: A — Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A — Both the assertion and reason are true. The reason directly explains why this prioritization was important—it preserved chemical grouping and enabled predictions. The example of iodine's placement exemplifies this principle perfectly.
Q3. Assertion (A):
The Modern Periodic Law states that properties of elements depend on their atomic weights.
Reason (R):
Atomic number, not atomic weight, is the true basis of periodicity because it directly reflects the electronic configuration of atoms.
Answer: D — A is false but R is true — The assertion is false—the Modern Periodic Law uses atomic number, not atomic weight (that was Mendeleev's original statement). The reason is true but irrelevant since the assertion itself is incorrect. This reflects the historical correction made to the periodic law.
Unlock more Assertion-Reason questions in Premium — unlock →
Case Study:
In 1869, a research scientist was studying the properties of newly discovered elements and noticed some inconsistencies with the then-proposed atomic weight-based ordering. She observed that an element with lower atomic weight than another showed stronger chemical similarity to a third element that had a much higher atomic weight. She consulted Mendeleev's newly published Periodic Table and found that his arrangement explained this anomaly perfectly. The element with lower atomic weight had been placed in a group with chemically similar elements, suggesting that chemical properties were more reliable than strict atomic weight order for organizing the periodic table.
Q1. Which principle from Mendeleev's classification system best explains why the element with lower atomic weight was placed separately from strict weight ordering?
Answer: B
Q2. The scientist's observation that chemical similarity transcended atomic weight order would later support the development of:
Answer: C
Q3. If this same scientist had been working in 1829 with Dobereiner's classification system instead, what limitation might she have encountered?
Answer: C
Q4. The scientist's confidence in Mendeleev's table was based on its ability to account for anomalies. Which additional feature of Mendeleev's system would have further strengthened her confidence?
Answer: A
Unlock more case studies in Premium — unlock →
Every formula and named reaction from all 9 chapters on one page, checked against the NCERT textbook and the CBSE 2026-27 syllabus. Free PDF download.
You've seen the free preview. Open the full interactive study kit — mind map, instant-graded quiz, progress tracking — free, no sign-in required.
Open Full Study Kit — Free →Premium unlocks the full Question Bank, Daily Practice Papers, Chapter Quiz and Full Mock Papers for every chapter.